Send a citation case for review

The lab studies how AI engines cite and attribute sources in answers about French businesses and topics. It focuses on the credit layer: which page is named, which page may have carried the claim first, and where attribution shifts.

The lab does not rank companies, declare one engine the winner or rewrite business pages as a service. Its materials are observations and methodological notes. They are meant to help readers understand citation behavior, not to sell a guaranteed visibility fix.

Read them as field records. Each note shows a prompt, answer behavior, source path and attribution pattern, with uncertainty marked where the trail is incomplete. One case is a clue; repeated cases carry more weight.

Yes. The lab accepts suggested prompts, citation mismatches, bilingual source conflicts and French business examples. A useful submission includes the visible answer, the cited source and the page that may have carried the original claim.

The lab may respond when a request fits its research scope and can be reviewed from public evidence. It avoids confidential disputes, reputation management campaigns and requests that require private data the team cannot verify.

Replies are manual and depend on how much source checking the case needs. A simple scope question may receive a shorter response, while a citation trail with several possible sources takes longer to review.

The base site is in English, and French material is part of the lab's public work. Cases involving both French and English sources are especially relevant because bilingual paths often change which source receives credit.